Welcome to Just Commodores, a site specifically designed for all people who share the same passion as yourself.

New Posts Contact us

Just Commodores Forum Community

It takes just a moment to join our fantastic community

Register

Yowies and Sasquatch

Derekthetree

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 19, 2019
Messages
542
Reaction score
1,363
Points
93
Location
Victoria
Members Ride
Gen-F R8 SV Manual
So you stayed up all night to bring us a paper that is:
  • Unpublished (academically speaking)
  • Peer review rejected (although there is no rejection letter, just an appeal letter from the author)
  • Where the appeal moans that another new species of monkey was accepted with less DNA evidence, but have provided living examples
  • Where the website hasn't been updated since 2015
  • Seems to suggest somebody mated with a satsquatch to produce these human hybrid DNA samples... are you not telling us something Shane?
 

Ginger Beer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2020
Messages
367
Reaction score
627
Points
93
Location
Sydney
Members Ride
Dunnydoore
More proof of existence, plus, evidence that human females are used for breeding

You heard it here first

still-land-of-the-lost01.jpg
 

shane_3800

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
2,498
Reaction score
839
Points
113
Age
32
Location
places
Members Ride
vr commo
So you stayed up all night to bring us a paper that is:
  • Unpublished (academically speaking)
  • Peer review rejected (although there is no rejection letter, just an appeal letter from the author)
  • Where the appeal moans that another new species of monkey was accepted with less DNA evidence, but have provided living examples
  • Where the website hasn't been updated since 2015
  • Seems to suggest somebody mated with a satsquatch to produce these human hybrid DNA samples... are you not telling us something Shane?
So we all know there is not a body yet. how much more proof do you need without a body that we all know has not been presented scientifically yet.
I literally gave you DNA proof which has not been excepted as you state because theres no body.
How can I present any more proof without a body? And in which case I would no longer need to provide proof as it would be a knowen species if there was a body presented for scientific examination.
 

immortality

Can't live without smoky bacon!
Staff member
Joined
Apr 15, 2006
Messages
16,399
Reaction score
5,033
Points
113
Location
Sth Auck, NZ
Members Ride
HSV VS Senator, VX s2 Calais S/C
Shane, go out and find one, shoot it if you must and then you will have scientifically acceptable proof. Until then you don't have enough evidence to meet either scientific or the legal standard of proof. Video alone doesn't prove ****.

Their are people that claim to have seen Elvis alive since his drug OD too!
 

shane_3800

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
2,498
Reaction score
839
Points
113
Age
32
Location
places
Members Ride
vr commo
Shane, go out and find one, shoot it if you must and then you will have scientifically acceptable proof. Until then you don't have enough evidence to meet either scientific or the legal standard of proof. Video alone doesn't prove ****.

Their are people that claim to have seen Elvis alive since his drug OD too!
So if I had 177 people sign an affidavit legally that would not be acceptable?
 

immortality

Can't live without smoky bacon!
Staff member
Joined
Apr 15, 2006
Messages
16,399
Reaction score
5,033
Points
113
Location
Sth Auck, NZ
Members Ride
HSV VS Senator, VX s2 Calais S/C
No, because even most of them only have grainy old video footage. Video alone doesn't prove anything, video doesn't even disprove it's some idiot in a costume.
 

Derekthetree

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 19, 2019
Messages
542
Reaction score
1,363
Points
93
Location
Victoria
Members Ride
Gen-F R8 SV Manual
So we all know there is not a body yet. how much more proof do you need without a body that we all know has not been presented scientifically yet.
I literally gave you DNA proof which has not been excepted as you state because theres no body.
How can I present any more proof without a body? And in which case I would no longer need to provide proof as it would be a knowen species if there was a body presented for scientific examination.
A peer accepted journal paper would be a start. You've presented the ramblings of one guy

I could construct what's in that website for a flying teapot in orbit of the sun (paper, fake peer review notes, pictures of "evidence" of the teapot....

Have you heard of Russell's teapot?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell's_teapot

Edit: lots of proof has been found of astronomical objects without physically seeing it. It's just the evidence is actual evidence, reviewed by recognised experts. What exacg evidence have you given, did you read the DNA paper?
 

lmoengnr

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2012
Messages
3,993
Reaction score
6,641
Points
113
Location
Sunbury Vic.
Members Ride
MY12.5 Maloo R8, MY12 Redline ute, Magnum 224
You'll never find one in china, they'd be considered a delicacy there...
 

shane_3800

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
2,498
Reaction score
839
Points
113
Age
32
Location
places
Members Ride
vr commo
A peer accepted journal paper would be a start. You've presented the ramblings of one guy

I could construct what's in that website for a flying teapot in orbit of the sun (paper, fake peer review notes, pictures of "evidence" of the teapot....

Have you heard of Russell's teapot?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell's_teapot

Edit: lots of proof has been found of astronomical objects without physically seeing it. It's just the evidence is actual evidence, reviewed by recognised experts. What exacg evidence have you given, did you read the DNA paper?
So I provide some proof of DNA and just like I thought. You're trying to find any way possible to not accept the evidence. I told you, you would do this.
 
Top